Upon reading Steve Kirsch’s 84% excess mortality reported by insurance co executive. Is this for real? where he claims attorney Todd Callender has misinterpreted the excess mortality as presented in this post: I reached out to Todd. He replied: Attached is the industry report from last year. It’s actually much higher. See attached.
Okay, but can you reach out to Todd and let him know that the DMED was fake and that the 1100% number from DMED was incorrect on three accounts (1) first occurrence vs. all occurrence query comparison, (2) there really was a glitch, and (3*) the 2016-2020 numbers were almost certainly all faked, meaning there is no denominator to compute from.
But most importantly, once he lets me walk him through (3*), he has a nuclear warhead in his arsenal.
What are you doing with setting up this public circular firing squad? Steve shouldn't be lobbing bombs, but maybe you could encourage an offline discussion to straighten this out before making us all into a joke. It's very implausible that Callender would be insuring anyone anymore if there's this kind of increase in disability and death in working-age people. Think about it.
Todd Callender Responds To Steve Kirsch Claims That He Misinterpreted Excess Mortality Data
Okay, but can you reach out to Todd and let him know that the DMED was fake and that the 1100% number from DMED was incorrect on three accounts (1) first occurrence vs. all occurrence query comparison, (2) there really was a glitch, and (3*) the 2016-2020 numbers were almost certainly all faked, meaning there is no denominator to compute from.
But most importantly, once he lets me walk him through (3*), he has a nuclear warhead in his arsenal.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/defining-away-vaccine-safety-signals-55a?s=w
Heads up, the link to the data is not working.
What are you doing with setting up this public circular firing squad? Steve shouldn't be lobbing bombs, but maybe you could encourage an offline discussion to straighten this out before making us all into a joke. It's very implausible that Callender would be insuring anyone anymore if there's this kind of increase in disability and death in working-age people. Think about it.
"There was an error retrieving your file."
"pornographic spyware detected"
The link is broken.
"There was an error retrieving your file."
not sure why an insurance exec is quoting DMED? No data from actual insurance company?
Fix yer shit.
My apologies for the double post. Ghost in the machine.