What Happens When You Post In An Especially CogDis Afflicted Subreddit Re: Dr. Malone's Recent Appearance On Joe Rogan?
Earlier in the day I posted on reddit’s Joe Rogan sub re: Dr. Malone’s appearance. I was fully cognizant of the confirmation biases in this sub, and fully anticipated aggressive downvotes, which was precisely why I wanted to provide a little balance to that Death Cultist skewed echo chamber.
My initial post - note the downvotes:
From out of the woodwork an alleged virologist materializes, one that has a rather peculiar posting track record, especially for a “PhD”:
False equivalence, and low-grade sophistry ensued:
His reply (16 upvotes) will be a cut and paste here since it’s too long for a screen shot:
I have patents. I’m not listing them here. I’ve been doxxed before, and it’s not fun. You’re just going to have to take my word for it. I hope you’re a reasonable person who can understand that.
The most egregious point in my opinion is implying that hospitals are manipulating Covid numbers for financial gain. No sane doctor would misdiagnose patients at risk of losing their license just for the hospital to make a buck. My wife diagnoses and treats Covid patients weekly. This is asinine to her. Malone oddly brings this up multiple times but clearly has no idea what he’s talking about.
The spike protein in the vaccine contains two proline mutations that lock the protein in it pre-fusion state, allowing an antibody response but preventing uptake by cells via the ACE2 receptor. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abd0826 this renders the spike inert but able to be recognized by the immune system to generate an antibody response
Now, The spike protein from the actual virus is free to enter cells and cause havoc on cells. These are the effects Malone is falsely attributing to the vaccine.
We now have billions of datapoints showing the vaccines are safe and effective. None of this is addressed by Malone. He cherry picks what his listeners want to hear.
2. I’m a scientist, not a politician. I can’t really speak to what Fauci has done regarding censorship, my understanding is that social media companies have taken it upon themselves to ban people who perpetuate misinformation. Generally, I’m in favor of open discussion, but as we’ve already seen in our discussion here, you’ve already indicated that you trust Malone more because he leads with his number of patents and his status. I tend to trust people more who skip that and show their data. The data should speak for itself.
There are many different types of vaccines. You are asking about a live attenuated or heat killed vaccine, however for decades we have used subunit based vaccines as well as adenovirus/DNA based vaccines to achieve the same effect. Now, we have mRNA based vaccines, which skips the DNA step in the central dogma (DNA>RNA>>protein) making the mRNA shot more efficient than the adenovirus/DNA based shots (J&J). There is no perceived disadvantage to not using actual Covid virions.
3. He’s full of shit because he’s not acknowledging the vast amount of data we have that Covid vaccines are safe and effective, and that the treatments he’s pushing such as Hydroxychloroquine have gone through double blind, placebo controlled trials and none have shown any promise
Studies regarding ivermectin are ongoing, but the first studies out don’t give any good data and some studies are tainted with bad methodology and bias, reviewed here:
My hypothesis is that existing non vaccine treatments such as antibody infusions will still blow ivermectin out of the water, even if we see any effectiveness. Regardless, Malone has concluded, without evidence, that ivermectin works, which is entirely unprofessional and not scientifically rigorous.
He’s also got this weird obsession with claiming he graduated from Harvard medical school, and while he took course there and received a certificate, his MD is from Northwestern. It’s just super odd to mislead about that, but this is all a pissing contest for Malone, and he believes that if he leads with Harvard, more people will trust him.
4. I feel like this is some sort of trick question to provide a red herring so you don’t have to discuss points 1-3 if you don’t like my answers. so I’m not putting much effort into it because it’s not related to the sars2 pandemic. Not particularly interested in having the “HIV doesn’t cause AIDS” debate today.
My hastily drafted reply with an assist from my business partner and dear friend who happens to be a molecular geneticist amongst his many other impressive credentials (1 upvote, and no more replies from our PhD after him having some technical difficulties tracking my initial reply):
Your response was very carefully replied to, with citations. (If the Remdesivir post is too much for you, then please ignore it.)
Since you are clearly having some kind of technical difficulties, here is the response specific to your post -- if you are intellectually honest you can line up each reply points 1, 2, 3, 4 with yours -- it's obvious why you would"end it here":
Thanks for your reply. Here are my responses (apologies in advance for the reddit reformatting):
Point 1. Your "evidence" re: hospitals manipulating is tenuously anecdotal. I too have anecdotal evidence having spoken with several NYC ICU doctors with none of them ever even having heard of VAERS, while admitting intubation had a mortality rate of around 99% and when pressed why they would ever consider such a protocol they all had lost blank stares. We spoke with nurse practitioners that told us point blank their doctors were covering up "vax" injuries, and refusing to even consider that the surge in myocarditis cases at their hospitals were related to these c19 injections. Also, we have incontrovertible proof that the government was and continues to incentivize the hospitals to overstate covid cases and to intubate in order to access said incentives -- this is well established really. So, your point is at best misguided and naïve. We know that incentivized hospitals have been caught gaming this "pandemic", and even YoY mortality for 2020 is anything but a pandemic (we like to cite Canadian 2020 YoY mortality given their illegal draconian lockdowns – they had 0.04% YoY mortality increase for the year of the “pandemic” 2020, same as years 2019 and 2018). We have nurses speaking out now (see:
We have doctors off the record corroborating all of this, and unable to go on the record because they are the breadwinners in their families and that is their priority. And equally as important, your wife et al. are using a PCR test which, as per the Nobel Laureate inventor, should never ever be used for infectious diseases, let alone at ct 40, or even 30 at that. Thus, Dr. Malone from our research is absolutely correct on this point.
Point 2. “The spike protein in the vaccine contains two proline mutations that lock the protein in it pre-fusion state, allowing an antibody response but preventing uptake by cells via the ACE2 receptor. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abd0826 this renders the spike inert but able to be recognized by the immune system to generate an antibody response” Technically this is correct, however, we end up with a spike protein where the two prolines make it harder to fuse with the membrane, and a number of issues arise from this:
A massive autoimmune response results from this spike now presenting itself as a misshapen cell surface protein that depletes ace1 that leads to blood clotting issues, etc. & etc.
This paper published by J Klassen proposes the modified cell surface misshapen spike protein presents itself as a prion that binds with other cells surface prions forming fibrils that are your building blocks to many prion based diseases (CJD, Lewey Body Dementia, Parkinson's etc) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33440640/ https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-vaccine-associated-parkinsons-disease-a-prion-disease-signal-in-the-uk-yellow-card-adverse-event-database-1746.pdf SARS-CoV-2 Prion-Like Domains in Spike Proteins Enable Higher Affinity to ACE2
We would argue that the modified HexaPro spike protein is actually MORE dangerous since it just sits there in the ACE2 area on its surface and causes havoc. Let’s not even get into the p53 protein suppression, all of the medium and long-term unknowns, etc. & etc.
The VAERS database, Eudravigilence database, and yellow card system in the UK have shown many cases of blood clotting, prion-based diseases, neurological diseases etc this post-vaccine administration supports the above. Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier also supports the above recently presenting ten cases of the very rare prion-based disease CJD following administration of the Pfizer vaccine. We have cases also following the administration of other vaccines.
As such, these “vaccines” are unsafe and ineffective. This is further evidenced with retracted claims preventing transmission, which we now know they don’t do. Now the claims are they attenuate symptoms, which is at best questionable. Also, as per Harvard study, VAERS is reporting at around 1% reporting, with an URF well established now of around 44.6% (i'd argue greater than that). All of this for a survivability rate of greater than 99.9% for the world population of anyone under 75 years of age without pre-existing conditions: a horrific risk/reward profile. Thus, Dr. Malone’s warnings are justified, well founded, and absolutely correct. We have many more research studies that we can cite to this effect.
Point 3. HCQ and IVM: David Boulware's paper has three fundamental problems
HCQ on its own is a suboptimal protocol and like many compounds needs to be taken in conjunction with several other compounds zinc, zpack, d3, c etc.
timing is critical and mail order for HCQ where patients wait 3 - 5 days is too late. 3)When the group was time stratified it actually proved efficacy depending on when they received the HCQ. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.09477.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33251500/ This paper uses a suboptimal protocol and is a waste of time. No zinc!
Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19) a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial - PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34215210/
Please acquaint yourself with this study so you can actually understand the way these combination therapies are intended to work vs citing BigPharma funded studies whose methodologies were intentionally designed to fail a drug in order to push through EUA:
These two websites provide much research-based evidence for the efficacy of HCQ and IVM:
Point 4. The reason you won’t provide a peer reviewed placebo control research study for HIV causing AIDS is because you can’t. That is also why for over 4 decades BigPharma and research teams were unable to come up with an “HIV”/“AIDS” vaccine. Chances are given your claims of "AIDS" "research" experience, you were/are funded by BigPharma and/or government agencies like NIH with money stolen via taxes; in fact, to date hundreds of billons in taxpayer monies were funneled into this elusive “HIV”/”AIDS” "vaccine" which has yielded 40+ years of FAIL, and will never ever be produced, and these very same corps and research teams suddenly and miraculously came up with a “covid” vaccine in no time (no to mention patents shared by NIH and Moderna for this very same "vax" filed years before "COVID-19" "pandemic")? This is all so painfully obvious, and yet people can’t see it, or their jobs depend on them not seeing it.
Ad hominem attacks, and claims of “full of shit” do not help your cause, which seems to be promoting a deadly unapproved vaccine for a virus which even in its alpha iteration had a greater than 99% survivability; repeat > 99.9%+. This too is irrefutable.
While you’re at it, why don’t you “debunk” the Canadian Covid Care Alliance video that Dr. Malone linked to which caused his Twitter ban (see: https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/l/P/E/S/lPESc.caa.mp4)? That assignment should at very least help you to appreciate just how criminal the BigPharma corps and the governments are that are behind these dangerous unapproved gene therapies.
Dr. Malone is rightly and justly questioning a dangerous “vax” for children that have an IFR of 0.0, and warning of “vax” passports and social credit scores which are unconstitutional and crimes against freedom. This entire “vax” program is a crime against humanity.
Thanks again for you attempt to answer my initial questions.
(I will also next reply with Remdesevir information in the hopes that you can start appreciating what a crime against humanity this whole scheme has been, and by you pushing these deadly injections you too are culpable if you are indeed a PhD researcher; ie you should know better.)
And that’s it. Crickets from our esteemed “PhD”. But yours truly added a couple of bonus comments to drive home the overall point of what is really transpiring:
PS: Remdesevir as a “standard of care” as coronated by Dr. Fauci in April 2020 on the basis of a study where the primary endpoints were changed from mortality benefit to reduced stay in hospital that arguably was statistically insignificant.
What the public didn’t hear about the NIH remdesivir trial:
The safety profile of this failed Ebola drug is horrific and has been known for many years to cause organ failure (Kidneys) in many patients and during the Ebola trials was in fact withdrawn for consideration due to > 50% of the patients dying from organ failure of this drug.
This placebo-controlled Chinese study showed that Remdesevir is utterly ineffective in keeping h keeping hospitalized patients alive or even reducing the duration of hospitalizations.
Remdesevir did not even reduce the presence of the virus in the blood. Worst of all the Chinese study confirmed Remdesevir’s deadly toxicity. Remdesevir caused serious injuries in 12% of the patients verus 5 percent in the placebo group.
Of the alleged 800,000+ dead Americans, how many do you think were?:
Patients with COVID + designation where the primary cause of death was something else but despite that the primary cause of death was incorrectly labeled as COVID? According to the CDC just 6% of these patients in 2020 actually died of COVID as a primary cause.
How many of these patients died from maltreatment? Namely toxic Remdesevir?
So organs fail caused by Remdesevir lungs take on water_-->misdiagnosed as viral pneumonia- ventilation via intubation 97.8% of patients over age 65 die from this.
This is a pandemic of malpractice, not the “Sarscov2” virus . If you want to end the tragedy you are witnessing at the Beaumont Hospital complex. Here is protocol where the average hospital mortality at 2 hospital centers in over 300 patients treated is 5.1%, which represents more than a 75% absolute risk reduction in mortality compared to the average published hospital mortality of 22.9% among COVID-19 patient
By the way, why would one treat a hospitalized patient with severe COVID who is hypoxic and suffering from blood acidosis with an antiviral like remdesevir when at this stage of the disease the virus is long gone and you are dealing with vascular damage from the spike protein and a whole plethora of other issues???
Ventilation via intubation is utterly useless and in fact, damages the lungs when you are not dealing with Impaired gas exchange from viral pneumonia but red blood cells that have lost their capacity to carry oxygen.
Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19 ...
By Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D. – https://aapsonline.org/bidens-bounty-on-your-life-hospitals-incentive-payments-for-covid-19/
All pushed by the very same people forcing deadly injections upon the planet.
PPS That is a bonus for you to help you appreciate the bigger picture here.
-- prior to PSYOP-19 asymptomatics could never transmit virus. (they still don't)
-- prior to 2019 masks did nothing for virus prevention. (they still don't)
-- prior to 2019 lockdowns did nothing for virus prevention. (they still don't)
-- prior to 2019 no mRNA vaccine made it past animal trials, and for very good reason. (they still wouldn't pass animal trials)
-- prior to 2019 any drug that resulted in 5 deaths received a BLACK BOX WARNING, if it resulted in 50 deaths it would be forever pulled from market
-- we can irrefutably establish by many magnitudes that these Death Injections have resulted in far more than 50 deaths.
Nothing short of Nuremberg 2.0 will put an end to this.
And the true purpose of yours truly posting in this echo chamber sub lies in this my reply to a sane redditor (again, note the downvotes):
Do NOT comply.