World Health Organization Study concludes risk of suffering Serious Injury due to COVID Vaccination is 339% higher than risk of being hospitalised with COVID-19
by THE EXPOSÉ
A new study endorsed by the World Health Organization has found that the risks of mRNA Covid-19 vaccination heavily outweigh the benefits, with scientists discovering a person is on average 339% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event such as cardiac arrest, stroke, or death due to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.
In 2020, prior to the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, the ‘Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations’ and ‘Brighton Collaboration’ created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines.
The list comprised adverse events of special interest (AESIs), adverse events associated with prior vaccines in general, theoretical associations based on animal models, and Covid-19 specific immunopathogenesis; the process of disease development involving an immune response or components thereof.
The World Health Organization’s Global Advisory Committee both endorsed and recommended the reporting of AESIs based on this priority list.
Scientists then sought to investigate the association between FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and serious adverse events identified by the Brighton Collaboration, using data from the still ongoing phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials on which emergency authorisation was based.
Scientists discovered that in the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) greatly surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants). This means recipients of the Modern injection were and are 140% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.
In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalisation relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants). This means recipients of the Pfizer injections were and are 339% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.
Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9).
The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for Covid-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).
The combined risk reduction for Covid-19 hospitalisation equates to 4.35 per 10,000 participants. Therefore, recipients of mRNA Covid19 injections were and are on average 187% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.
The scientists who conducted the study noted how when the FDA reviewed serious adverse events (SAEs) in relation to the Pfizer vaccine they concluded that SAEs were “balanced between treatment groups”.
But in contrast to the FDA’s questionable review, the scientists who conducted the W.H.O. endorsed study found an increased risk of all-cause serious adverse events in the Pfizer trial.
The full World Health Organization endorsed study can be viewed in full here, but the scientists concluded that a systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data should be undertaken to address questions of harm-benefit in various demographic subgroups.
However, they note that to do this full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. But unfortunately, well over a year after the widespread use of COVID-19 vaccines, participant-level data remain inaccessible. With the FDA attempting to delay the release of some of this data for 75 years.
The ol’ good criminal cop, bad criminal cop routine:
As the criminal and unconstitutional federal government “agency” which is neither federal nor has any legal right to rule against any substance that a person may want to ingest from Ivermectin to Draino to even the DEATHVAX™ itself or any supplement is busily aiding and abetting their BigPharma partners in crime while sterilizing and killing off toddlers and babies, the W.H.O. is concurrently running a wholly different game.
Just like Pfizer’s veterinarian CEO Bourla recently commenced dropping small mea culpa and plausible deniability hints, so too is the W.H.O. now hedging their Crimes Against Humanity gambits by dropping truthiness studies like the one above. When the Cult gives their go ahead to invert the current “Safe and Effective” narrative in order to usher in total societal and government collapse, or so they wish, the likes of the war criminal W.H.O. director Tedros will have a trail of qualifications and excuses, as well as his fellow puppet associates like Bill Gates. At this stage all of these higher up Cult useful idiots will be tossed under the proverbial bus as the One World Government will swoop in with “solutions” and “punishments” in order to save the day.
At which point a sufficient amount of Modified mRNA Genetically Modified Humans will be dead and damaged, and thus the survivors will be adequately primed for total social credit score CBDC UBI compliance, especially when their lives will literally depend on continual DEATHVAX™ 2.0 and 3.0 injections to hold back the damage from the initial gene therapy servings they are still diligently lining up for and will continue to do so for the imminent PSYOP-22 “pandemic”.
Do NOT comply.